File:Contributions.svg

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

	Date/Time	Thumbnail	Dimensions	User	Comment
current	14:26, 14 April 2023		19 × 23 (2 KB)	Wikinuma (talk | contribs)	edit by Henning Gross from the Noun Project : https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=edit&i=966943

More than 100 pages use this file. The following list shows the first 100 pages that use this file only. A full list is available.

• A necessary being can only give rise to a contingent universe
• A universe made from nothing is possible, says Lawrence Krauss
• An immaterial point is an abstraction, and an abstraction cannot cause anything.
• Argument test
• Argument test 2
• Arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases
• Atheism posits a primordial energy whose origin it can never explain.
• Atheists claim that the universe before the Planck Wall is impossible to describe, not that it came out of "nothing".
• Because the universe is contingent, it has a cause
• Causality is not linked to temporal succession
• Considering that God is the first cause explains nothing
• Denying that God has a cause is an arbitrary assumption
• Everything has a cause, and God in particular
• Everything that exists has a reason to exist
• Freedom is inexplicable within the framework of materialism
• God's existence can be experienced with immediate certainty
• God's existence is contained in his concept
• God created a morality independent of men
• God exists because there cannot be an infinite number of causes
• God exists because there cannot be an infinite past
• God gives an account of the world's master plan
• God is a contradictory concept
• God is a filler concept
• God is an invention
• God is but the name of our ignorance
• God is everlasting
• God is the cause of the existence of beings
• God is the central creature of the universe. Without Him, nothing would be existent.
• God is the first cause of the universe
• God is timeless, therefore causeless
• Human existence is no match for God
• Human freedom contradicts the existence of a god
• Human nature aspires to God
• If the universe has no cause, then it is not necessary for it to exist.
• If the world were chaotic, there would be no language to talk about it.
• In essence, existence implies temporality
• No evidence of a god
• Not "everything" but "every effect" has a cause
• Nothingness is not governed by laws, so nothing prevents it from generating the universe.
• Only God is the guarantor of the reality and veracity of the world.
• Primordial energy is the stuff of which all beings are made; it exists on its own and does not need God to exist.
• Religions contradict each other
• Science has never claimed to be able to explain everything in the future.
• The Big Bang has a cause
• The Big Bang is not an absolute singularity, but a phase from which science can say nothing.
• The Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem (2003) demonstrates that there is no infinite past.
• The First Cause is the Hindu Brahman, self-conscious and indifferent to humans.
• The God hypothesis is simpler than the atheist hypothesis
• The absence of human freedom contradicts the existence of a god
• The argument that God does not exist because there is no first instant of time commits the same error as Zeno's paradox.
• The beginning is not the origin
• The connection between the kalam argument and Zeno's paradox doesn't hold water.
• The exception to the principle of sufficient reason deserves justification
• The existence of the universe is explained by the infinite chain of causes of physical events.
• The fact that everything has a reason to exist doesn't prove that God is that same reason.
• The fallacy of composition is not a fallacy
• The first cause cannot be an abstraction
• The first cause cannot be material
• The first cause has consciousness
• The first cause is a necessary being
• The first cause is an immaterial point
• The first cause is the Big Bang
• The first cause is unknowable
• The first cause may be of a non-physical nature
• The idea of "contradictory" is not applicable to the Universe, which is based on the laws of quantum physics.
• The idea of a first cause neither proves nor disproves the existence of God
• The idea of creation out of nothing is absurd
• The idea of time without beginning is inconceivable because it is contradictory.
• The idea of time without beginning leads us to abandon the notion of time.
• The kalam's reasoning is only valid for a finite time.
• The kalam argument commits the same error as Zeno in his paradox
• The need for something to exist presupposes the existence of God
• The order and complexity of the world presuppose a Creator God
• The presentation of the kalam argument is misleading
• The principle of causality does not apply to the universe
• The question of a finite or infinite past neither proves nor disproves the existence of God.
• The reasoning that a necessary being can only give rise to a necessary universe confuses logical implication with causal link.
• The shared experience of reality is stable
• The universe began to exist with the Big Bang
• The universe has no beginning
• The universe has no cause or reason for being
• The universe is contingent
• The universe is too empty, too ancient and too vast to correspond to the God of religions.
• The universe was created from nothing
• The world had a beginning and therefore has a first cause.
• The world is not orderly but chaotic
• There's no reason why God should be the first cause.
• There are an infinite number of Big Bangs and Big Crunches
• There are divine interventions
• There are infinite universes before our universe
• There are various interpretations of the Borde-Guth-Valenkin theorem that allow us to assume an uncreated universe.
• There is no first instant of time
• There is no spirit outside matter
• There is too much suffering and injustice for there to be a god
• There should be nothing
• Those who speak of creating from nothing are playing with words
• To claim that there is either a divine hypothesis or a known scientific explanation is to commit a false dilemma.
• To say that God is a filler concept is an unfalsifiable argument.
• We have concepts within us that only God could have created.
• We must accept the mystery

View more links to this file.