The first cause may be of a non-physical nature
Wikidebates, the encyclopedia of “pro” and “con” arguments
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Summary[ edit ]
Quotes[ edit ]
“The reasons for claiming a cause have not disappeared: the essential point in our case is that the universe came into existence at a moment in the past. The fact that this radical beginning was not preceded by a physical moment doesn't change anything essential: there is indeed a first moment in the universe's existence, which has actually elapsed to make way for the next moment, and which naturally calls for a cause, an explanation. That this first moment was not preceded by a physical moment does not imply that it had no cause; it only implies that it had no physical cause. The only way out would be to assert that physical being arose from absolute nothingness - in other words, that nothing generated something.”
Frédéric Guillaud, God exists, p.234, Éditions du Cerf, Paris, 2013.