Does this page title clearly describe the argument? Rename page if not. The title of this argument is
disadvantageous. It presents the argument in a partial or caricatured way.
The title of this argument is
unclear. It is confusing, jargon-heavy, too allusive, or too telegraphic.
The title of this argument is
incomplete. It is ambiguous or not understandable on its own.
Rewrite the title as a complete sentence that clearly and precisely conveys the argument.
This argument is considered
sensitive. Its content may be shocking.
It has not been removed insofar as its presence can be attested in the public space and it does not violate the law.
This argument is considered
fanciful. A citation is needed to prove that it exists in the public space.
Reminder: according to the
founding principles, arguments are only relayed insofar as their presence can be attested in the public space.
Reminder: according to the
founding principles, all arguments may be included as long as they do not break the law.
This argument is a “pro” argument in the debate :
Debate test?.
This argument is a “con” argument in the debate :
Debate test?.
Summary
Blablablabla….
Quotes
This quote is too short
The selected excerpt contains no reasoning or example. Choose a longer excerpt or remove the quote.
This quote is too long
The selected excerpt is too long or mixes distinct arguments. Remove unnecessary passages (use brackets [...] if needed), or split it into several quotes, each focused on one argument.
The quote reference is incomplete
Some important fields (author, title, date, ...) have not been filled in. How about completing them?
« You wish to form an opinion on a given issue? You seek to know the different sides on a given issue, without having to spend hours of research all around the internet? Wikidebates is just for that. »
Author not provided
References
- Alain Finkielkraut, Après le relativisme
Incomplete reference
Some important fields have not been filled in. How about completing them?
Incomplete reference
Some important fields have not been filled in. How about completing them?
- sdfsdgds
Incomplete reference
Some important fields have not been filled in. How about completing them?
Justifications
This subsection needs to be
reorganizeSome arguments are redundant, intertwined, or the structure needs clarification.
Objections
This subsection needs to be
reorganizeSome objections are redundant, intertwined, or the structure needs clarification.
Parent debate
renameEdit