Argument test

[ rename ][ ]

Does this page title give a clear and precise idea of the argument? Rename the page if not.

The title of this argument is disadvantageous. It presents the argument in a lacunary or caricatured way. Find a more persuasive wording.

The title of this argument is unclear. It is confusing, jargon, too allusive or telegraphic. Rewrite the title as a complete sentence that gives a clear and precise idea of the argument.

The title of this argument is incomplete. It is ambiguous or incomprehensible on its own. Rewrite the title as a complete sentence that gives a clear and precise idea of the argument. Detailed article: Help:Correcting an incomplete argument title

The title of this argument is too long. It contains several sentences or is generally too developed. Rewrite the title as a compact sentence that clearly and precisely summarizes the argument.

This argument is considered sensitive. Its content may shock. Reminder: the arguments are relayed on Wikidebates only insofar as their presence can be attested in the public space. They are endorsed neither by the contributors of the site, nor by the association which administers Wikidebates.

This argument is considered fanciful. A quote is necessary in order to provide proof of the existence of this argument in the public space. Please provide citations to the talk page showing that conflicting opinions are held on the matter. Reminder: according to the founding principles, an argument has its place on Wikidebates only insofar as its presence can be attested in the public space.

This argument is considered potentially illegal. Reminder: according to the founding principles, all arguments have their place on Wikidebates provided that they do not contravene the law.

Keywords: test[ edit ].

Summary

The summary of this argument is yet to be written.

No content has been provided or the text entered corresponds to a note taking. How about writing it?

This summary mixes several arguments.

This summary mixes arguments that need to be dissociated. Create a specific page for each of them.

The summary of this argument is too long.

It contains redundancies, heavy sentences, or is overall too developed. The text should be lightened.

The summary of this argument is not clear enough.

This summary is confusing, jargon, overly complex or overly telegraphic. It needs to be made more understandable.

The summary of this argument is disadvantageous.

The argument is presented in a lacunary or caricatured way. A more convincing version needs to be written.

The style of this summary needs to be reviewed.

This summary is written in a personal ( “I think that…”) or overly familiar way. It needs to be rewritten.

Blablablabla….

Quotes

This quote is too short.

The selected excerpt does not contain any reasoning or examples. Select a longer excerpt or delete the quote.

This quote is too long.

The selected excerpt is too long or mixes different arguments. Delete the superfluous passages, if necessary by using the square brackets […], or cut this excerpt into several quotes, each centered on an argument.

The quote reference is incomplete.

Some important fields (author, title, date, …) have not been filled in. What if you complete them?

“You wish to form an opinion on a given issue? You seek to know the different sides on a given issue, without having to spend hours of research all around the internet? Wikidebates is just for that.”

Author not entered.

References

• Alain Finkielkraut, Après le relativisme.
  Insufficient quality reference

  More rigorous or better argued content can be found for this argument.
  Incomplete reference

  Some important fields have not been filled in. What if you complete them?
• sdfsdgds.
  Broken link

  The page no longer exists at this address. How about updating the link?
  Insufficient quality reference

  More rigorous or better argued content can be found for this argument.
  Incomplete reference

  Some important fields have not been filled in. What if you complete them?

Justifications

This section is to reorganize.

Arguments are redundant, need to be unraveled, or its structure can be clarified. Do not hesitate to review it.

• Argument test 2
• Argument test 2
• Argument test 2
• Argument test 2
• Argument test 2
• Argument test 2
• Argument test 2

Add an argument

Objections

This section is to reorganize.

Objections are redundant, need to be unraveled, or its structure can be clarified. Do not hesitate to review it.

• Argument test 2

Add an objection

Parent debate

• Debate test?