Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• God gives an account of the world's master plan  + (Grenoble)
• Only God could have placed the concept of unity within us.  + (Grenoble)

• The God hypothesis is simpler than the atheist hypothesis  + (Paris)
• God exists because there cannot be an infinite number of causes  + (Paris)
• The argument that God does not exist because there is no first instant of time commits the same error as Zeno's paradox.  + (Paris)
• The universe has no beginning  + (Paris)
• The beginning is not the origin  + (Paris)
• God is everlasting  + (Paris)
• The idea of time without beginning is inconceivable because it is contradictory.  + (Paris)
• The idea of time without beginning leads us to abandon the notion of time.  + (Paris)
• The connection between the kalam argument and Zeno's paradox doesn't hold water.  + (Paris)
• The universe began to exist with the Big Bang  + (Paris)
• Causality is not linked to temporal succession  + (Paris)
• The first cause may be of a non-physical nature  + (Paris)
• The exception to the principle of sufficient reason deserves justification  + (Paris)
• Because the universe is contingent, it has a cause  + (Paris)
• Not "everything" but "every effect" has a cause  + (Paris)
• The fallacy of composition is not a fallacy  + (Paris)
• Without a first cause, the series of causes cannot be explained.  + (Paris)
• Those who speak of creating from nothing are playing with words  + (Paris)
• The idea of creation out of nothing is absurd  + (Paris)
• The universe is contingent  + (Paris)
• If the universe has no cause, then it is not necessary for it to exist.  + (Paris)
• The need for something to exist presupposes the existence of God  + (Paris)
• The reasoning that a necessary being can only give rise to a necessary universe confuses logical implication with causal link.  + (Paris)
• A necessary being can only give rise to a contingent universe  + (Paris)
• An immaterial point is an abstraction, and an abstraction cannot cause anything.  + (Paris)
• The first cause cannot be an abstraction  + (Paris)
• The first cause has consciousness  + (Paris)
• Comparing God to man is a legitimate analogy in a certain sense.  + (Paris)
• God explains the highly improbable adjustment of the universe's fundamental constants  + (Paris)
• That God has succeeded in adjusting the laws of the universe is at least as improbable as its existence.  + (Paris)
• There are a very large number of planets suitable for life  + (Paris)
• The hypothesis of a God is even more improbable than that of the appearance of life.  + (Paris)
• There are good reasons to believe that the appearance of life will be explained  + (Paris)
• It's not chance but natural selection that explains the creation, adaptation and complexity of species.  + (Paris)
• God explains the existence of consciousness  + (Paris)
• God is an inexplicable explanation  + (Paris)
• The existence of God is even more improbable than what God is supposed to have created.  + (Paris)
• The fact that we can't explain God doesn't mean he doesn't exist.  + (Paris)
• So-called miracles are illusions of the human brain  + (Paris)
• Arguments in favor of miracles are always more improbable than rational explanations.  + (Paris)
• Mystical experiences are due to psychic disorders.  + (Paris)
• Mystical experiences only happen to people with a religious culture  + (Paris)
• Revelations preserved in sacred texts attest to God's intervention  + (Paris)
• Sacred texts are unreliable  + (Paris)
• The more scientific you are, the less religious you are  + (Paris)
• The higher your level of education, the less religious you are  + (Paris)
• Having the opportunity to suffer makes great good possible  + (Paris)