Search by property
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- God gives an account of the world's master plan + (Grenoble)
- Only God could have placed the concept of unity within us. + (Grenoble)
- The God hypothesis is simpler than the atheist hypothesis + (Paris)
- God exists because there cannot be an infinite number of causes + (Paris)
- The argument that God does not exist because there is no first instant of time commits the same error as Zeno's paradox. + (Paris)
- The universe has no beginning + (Paris)
- The beginning is not the origin + (Paris)
- God is everlasting + (Paris)
- The idea of time without beginning is inconceivable because it is contradictory. + (Paris)
- The idea of time without beginning leads us to abandon the notion of time. + (Paris)
- The connection between the kalam argument and Zeno's paradox doesn't hold water. + (Paris)
- The universe began to exist with the Big Bang + (Paris)
- Causality is not linked to temporal succession + (Paris)
- The first cause may be of a non-physical nature + (Paris)
- The exception to the principle of sufficient reason deserves justification + (Paris)
- Because the universe is contingent, it has a cause + (Paris)
- Not "everything" but "every effect" has a cause + (Paris)
- The fallacy of composition is not a fallacy + (Paris)
- Without a first cause, the series of causes cannot be explained. + (Paris)
- Those who speak of creating from nothing are playing with words + (Paris)
- The idea of creation out of nothing is absurd + (Paris)
- The universe is contingent + (Paris)
- If the universe has no cause, then it is not necessary for it to exist. + (Paris)
- The need for something to exist presupposes the existence of God + (Paris)
- The reasoning that a necessary being can only give rise to a necessary universe confuses logical implication with causal link. + (Paris)
- A necessary being can only give rise to a contingent universe + (Paris)
- An immaterial point is an abstraction, and an abstraction cannot cause anything. + (Paris)
- The first cause cannot be an abstraction + (Paris)
- The first cause has consciousness + (Paris)
- Comparing God to man is a legitimate analogy in a certain sense. + (Paris)
- God explains the highly improbable adjustment of the universe's fundamental constants + (Paris)
- That God has succeeded in adjusting the laws of the universe is at least as improbable as its existence. + (Paris)
- There are a very large number of planets suitable for life + (Paris)
- The hypothesis of a God is even more improbable than that of the appearance of life. + (Paris)
- There are good reasons to believe that the appearance of life will be explained + (Paris)
- It's not chance but natural selection that explains the creation, adaptation and complexity of species. + (Paris)
- God explains the existence of consciousness + (Paris)
- God is an inexplicable explanation + (Paris)
- The existence of God is even more improbable than what God is supposed to have created. + (Paris)
- The fact that we can't explain God doesn't mean he doesn't exist. + (Paris)
- So-called miracles are illusions of the human brain + (Paris)
- Arguments in favor of miracles are always more improbable than rational explanations. + (Paris)
- Mystical experiences are due to psychic disorders. + (Paris)
- Mystical experiences only happen to people with a religious culture + (Paris)
- Revelations preserved in sacred texts attest to God's intervention + (Paris)
- Sacred texts are unreliable + (Paris)
- The more scientific you are, the less religious you are + (Paris)
- The higher your level of education, the less religious you are + (Paris)
- Having the opportunity to suffer makes great good possible + (Paris)