Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• The kalam's reasoning is only valid for a finite time.  + (575)
• The presentation of the kalam argument is misleading  + (576)
• The question of a finite or infinite past neither proves nor disproves the existence of God.  + (577)
• The universe began to exist with the Big Bang  + (578)
• The universe has no cause or reason for being  + (579)
• Causality is not linked to temporal succession  + (580)
• The first cause may be of a non-physical nature  + (581)
• The exception to the principle of sufficient reason deserves justification  + (582)
• Because the universe is contingent, it has a cause  + (583)
• There are an infinite number of Big Bangs and Big Crunches  + (584)
• There are infinite universes before our universe  + (585)
• The Big Bang is not an absolute singularity, but a phase from which science can say nothing.  + (586)
• God is the cause of the existence of beings  + (587)
• Primordial energy is the stuff of which all beings are made; it exists on its own and does not need God to exist.  + (588)
• Atheism posits a primordial energy whose origin it can never explain.  + (589)
• Everything has a cause, and God in particular  + (590)
• Not "everything" but "every effect" has a cause  + (591)
• God is timeless, therefore causeless  + (592)
• Denying that God has a cause is an arbitrary assumption  + (593)
• In essence, existence implies temporality  + (594)
• The world had a beginning and therefore has a first cause.  + (595)
• The first cause is unknowable  + (596)
• Atheists claim that the universe before the Planck Wall is impossible to describe, not that it came out of "nothing".  + (597)
• The idea of a first cause neither proves nor disproves the existence of God  + (598)
• Everything that exists has a reason to exist  + (599)

• The fact that everything has a reason to exist doesn't prove that God is that same reason.  + (600)

• The principle of causality does not apply to the universe  + (601)
• The fallacy of composition is not a fallacy  + (602)
• We must follow the truth of our senses  + (603)
• Without a first cause, the series of causes cannot be explained.  + (604)
• The universe was created from nothing  + (605)
• Those who speak of creating from nothing are playing with words  + (606)
• The idea of creation out of nothing is absurd  + (607)
• The universe is contingent  + (608)
• If the universe has no cause, then it is not necessary for it to exist.  + (609)
• The need for something to exist presupposes the existence of God  + (610)
• The reasoning that a necessary being can only give rise to a necessary universe confuses logical implication with causal link.  + (611)
• A necessary being can only give rise to a contingent universe  + (612)
• The first cause is the Big Bang  + (613)
• The Big Bang has a cause  + (614)
• The first cause is an immaterial point  + (615)
• An immaterial point is an abstraction, and an abstraction cannot cause anything.  + (616)
• There's no reason why God should be the first cause.  + (617)
• The first cause is a necessary being  + (618)
• The first cause cannot be material  + (619)
• The first cause cannot be an abstraction  + (620)
• The first cause has consciousness  + (621)
• The First Cause is the Hindu Brahman, self-conscious and indifferent to humans.  + (622)
• God is a filler concept  + (623)
• To say that God is a filler concept is an unfalsifiable argument.  + (624)
• Science has never claimed to be able to explain everything in the future.  + (625)