Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Explanation by chance is even more inexplicable than explanation by God  + (789)
• Chance is a complex set of causes, so it's not improbable.  + (790)
• Denial of chance is a cognitive bias  + (791)
• The order and complexity of the world presuppose only a supreme Intelligence indifferent to mankind.  + (792)
• God wanted man  + (793)
• Revelations show that the Creator is interested in human beings  + (794)
• Miracles attest to God's direct intervention  + (795)
• The resurrection and wonders of Jesus Christ prove the existence of God  + (796)
• The resurrection of Christ is just a mythological tale  + (797)
• Levitations like those of St Joseph of Copertino prove the existence of God  + (798)
• Miraculous healings prove the existence of God  + (799)
• It's just a sign of imperfect medical knowledge  + (800)
• Our Lady's apparitions and prodigies at Fatima prove the existence of God  + (801)
• The prodigy performed in front of a large crowd, including journalists, skeptics and a photographer.  + (802)
• The event took place in 20th-century Europe, and is verifiable and not remote.  + (803)
• The anticlerical context in Portugal at the time was hostile to the belief in miracles.  + (804)
• Fatima is a legend, nothing happened  + (805)
• This hypothesis has never been supported, as it is contradicted by the mass of eyewitness accounts and photos.  + (806)
• The sun's trajectory wasn't really deviated, so there was no miracle.  + (807)
• There's no need for the sun's trajectory to have been actually deviated; it's a miracle in itself that a whole crowd saw the sun "dance".  + (808)
• Fatima is a fraud  + (809)
• The Fatima phenomena cannot be a deception  + (810)
• It's a collective hallucination  + (811)
• The notion of "collective hallucination" is not scientific  + (812)
• Collective hallucination has never been observed in thousands of people.  + (813)

• Affective contagions require conditions that were not present at all at Fatima.  + (814)

• An exceptional meteorological phenomenon  + (815)
• No exceptional weather phenomenon could have been predicted in advance by 3 illiterate children  + (816)
• It's a UFO phenomenon  + (817)
• Testimonies have not been sufficiently well collected, and some contradict each other: we can therefore say nothing about them  + (818)
• There are contradictions between the testimonies  + (819)
• The testimonies do not give a detailed account of the phenomena.  + (820)
• The testimonies are relatively few compared to the crowds present.  + (821)
• Even if the testimonies have not been rigorously collected, they are sufficient to establish that an extraordinary phenomenon has occurred.  + (822)
• We establish historical facts from fragmentary and not rigorously established testimonies, we don't have to ask more for a miracle.  + (823)
• The Church has never officially confirmed the miraculous nature of this phenomenon.  + (824)
• After 7 years of investigation, the Church has officially recognized the Fatima phenomenon.  + (825)
• The visual phenomena around the sun at Fatima can be explained by the sun's fixation.  + (826)
• The Fatima witnesses stared at the sun without suffering any after-effects, which shows that the phenomenon is not natural.  + (827)
• The Fatima phenomena are a parhelia  + (828)
• The bilocations of saints prove the existence of God  + (829)
• Inedias (saints who live without eating) prove the existence of God  + (830)
• Studies validating inedication are fraudulent  + (831)
• No proven fraud in Catholic saint inedies  + (832)
• MIVILUDES classifies the practice of inedience as a sectarian aberration  + (833)
• The inedias denounced by Milivitudes concern New Age groupuscules and say nothing about Catholic inedias.  + (834)
• So-called "inedia" demonstrations are faked  + (835)
• Just because an event is scientifically unexplained doesn't mean it proves the existence of God (Appeal to ignorance)  + (836)
• Claims of divine intervention are based on unreliable evidence  + (837)
• There are reliable testimonies attesting to God's interventions  + (838)
• Testimonials can be biased  + (839)