Claims of divine intervention are based on unreliable evidence

From Wikidebates
Wikidebates, the encyclopedia of “pro” and “con” arguments
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument againstThis argument is an objection to Miracles attest to God's direct intervention and There are divine interventions.
Keywords: God, Miracles, Mystical Experiences, Divine Providence, Divine Revelation, Proof, Reliability, Testimonies, Subjectivity[ edit ].

SummarySummary
[ edit ]

No summary has been entered yet.

QuotationsQuotes
[ edit ]

No quotes have been entered yet.

ReferencesReferences
[ edit ]

No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustifications
[ edit ]

    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjections
[ edit ]

  • Argument againstThere are reliable testimonies attesting to God's interventions
  • Argument againstThere are medical documents attesting to miraculous cures and inediencies.
  • Argument againstWhen it comes to God, skeptics demand ever more demanding and almost impossible proof.

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Claims_of_divine_intervention_are_based_on_unreliable_evidence&oldid=6950"