Property:Page parameters
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a property of type Text.
"
737<><div style="font-size: 90%;">''No content has been entered yet.''</div><><>To exist, national identity doesn't have to be rational or sensible.-¡-To exist, national identity doesn't have to be rational or sensible.<>0<>1<><><> +
3
1668<><div style="font-size: 90%;">''No content has been entered yet.''</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +
5
1659<><div>
Any citizen get 500 carbon points Ͼ for first year, it's enough for Paris-Athens-Paris or Roma-Stockholm-Roma. Those who want to travel more by flight can buy surpluses, more and more expensive but not forbidden.</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +
6
1653<><div>
The 6% annual reduction in the carbon money distributed to Europeans ensures that airlines cannot exceed this constantly shrinking volume.</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +
8
1657<><div>
The 6% annual reduction in carbon money ensures that airlines can only use as much carbon as they need to keep the planet in balance: 6% less each year, equivalent to 83% less in 30 years.</div><div style="margin-top: 0.75em; font-size: 103%;">'''References'''</div><ul class="references-argument"><li>Alain Trannoy, Pierre-Henri Bono, ''[https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-economie-politique-2024-4-page-553?tab=resume Revue d'économie politique]'', 2024-4, page 553, Paris, 09/09/2024.</li>[[ author::Alain Trannoy| ]][[ author::Pierre-Henri Bono| ]]</ul><><><>0<>0<><><> +
A
640<><blockquote>“Why should we be surprised that mankind's gods are anthropomorphic? This was true of the Greek and Latin gods. It's no less true, albeit from a different point of view, of the Gods of the various monotheisms. He is conceived by analogy with what we are or know: God is to nature what the artist or craftsman is to his work (what the architect is to the house, what the watchmaker is to the clock, etc.); he is to humanity what a father is to his children, what a sovereign is to his people; he is to the Church what the husband is to the wife... From then on, whatever we may affirm positively about God, it will be marked by anthropomorphism. The religions of the Book are no exception. It's not enough to ban images of God (in Judaism or Islam) to free oneself from the imaginary! Anthropomorphism is more essential: it affects the very concept of divinity. This is the price we pay for analogy. To say that God is spiritual, personal and creative is already anthropomorphism. To say that God is Father is still anthropomorphism. But it's the Gospels that say it, and it's the Church: reread the Our Father and the Creed... To say that God is just, that he is powerful and wise, as the Bible and the Koran do, is still anthropomorphism. To say that he is loving, compassionate or merciful, likewise... But what then can we say about God, beyond all anthropomorphism, if not, very precisely, nothing? This brings us back to the first hypothesis of Plato's Parmenides. If the One exists, we can say nothing about it: "There is not even a name for it; we can neither define it, nor know it, nor feel it, nor judge it." But then, we have no reason to see a God in it, and no way of thinking about it. Any anthropomorphism concerning the absolute is naive or derisory. Silence, in the face of the unspeakable, would be better.”</blockquote>
<div class="reference-citation">André Comte-Sponville, ''The spirit of atheism'', Albin Michel, 2006.</div><><>God may very well be anthropomorphic, even if this is hardly credible.-¡-What is implausible can be true -;- Comparing God to man is a legitimate analogy in a certain sense.-¡-Comparing God to man is a legitimate analogy in a certain sense. -;- God is in man's image because man is in God's image-¡-God is in man's image because man is in God's image<>0<>3<><><>
1115<><blockquote>“But this god is all the weaker, for Alain, because he is not God - he is only the spirit ("always humiliated, scorned, crucified, always reborn on the third day"): he is only in man. True humanism: true spiritualism, but without Church, without dogmas, without God. I find it harder to conceive of this weak God we're told about, who would have enough power to create the universe and man, possibly to raise us from the dead, but not enough to save a child or his people.”</blockquote>
<div class="reference-citation">André Comte-Sponville, ''The spirit of atheism'', Albin Michel, 2006.</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +
693<><div>
Search results are based on Bing, Microsoft's search engine. However, Microsoft claims to use 60% renewable energy for its server power consumption, compared with 100% for Google.</div><div style="margin-top: 0.75em; font-size: 103%;">'''References'''</div><ul class="references-argument">[[:Template:Site reference]]</ul><><><>0<>0<><><> +
1553<><div>
How to demonstrate that an argument is biased, twisted ...? What are the criteria!? That's where to start ... To assert is only to assert ...!</div><><>The criteria for defining a biased argument are defined by zetetics, which is the science of critical thinking.-¡-The criteria for defining a biased argument are defined by zetetics, which is the science of critical thinking.<>0<>1<><><> +
1548<><div>
The supposed naturalness of an idea used as a criterion to validate it.</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +
1645<><div>
A carbon fee and dividend or climate income is a system to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change. The system imposes a carbon tax on the sale of fossil fuels, and then distributes the revenue of this tax over the entire population (equally, on a per-person basis) as a monthly income or regular payment.</div><div style="margin-top: 0.75em; font-size: 103%;">'''References'''</div><ul class="references-argument"><li>Wikipedia, “[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_fee_and_dividend Carbon fee and dividend]”, ''Wikipedia''.</li>[[ author::Wikipedia| ]]<li>Citizen's Climate lobby, “[https://citizensclimatelobby.org/basics-carbon-fee-dividend/ The Basics of Carbon Fee and Dividend]”.</li>[[ author::Citizen's Climate lobby| ]]</ul><><><>0<>0<><><> +
1330<><div>
A strong society has enough confidence in its values, its way of life, its cohesion, not to feel threatened by the arrival of newcomers or other cultures. Europeans are disoriented, they've "lost faith", something has broken. From such an observation, we can assume a kind of end of the European world, like Onfray or Houellebecq.
Alternatively, we could propose to rediscover the intellectual and cultural foundations that would restore Europeans' confidence in their culture and its ability to embrace differences. As Carlo Strenger puts it, we need to "return to the Enlightenment". On the contrary, by rediscovering the fundamental principles on which our societies are based, we'll gain in confidence and strength, which in turn will lead to a more serene approach to the Other.</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +
612<><blockquote>“In fact, it's perfectly impossible for an absolutely necessary being to produce anything as necessary as itself. In fact, there is only one necessary being, so in order to produce something absolutely necessary, the necessary being would have to produce itself, which is absurd. If the necessary being produces something, it is necessarily something contingent.”</blockquote>
<div class="reference-citation">Frédéric Guillaud, ''God exists'', p.197-198, Éditions du Cerf, Paris, 2013.</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +
1076<><div>
Scientific invalidity is a sine qua non for applying the "paranormal" label.</div><blockquote>“The '''paranormal''' is a term used to describe a set of supposed phenomena that are neither observable nor explicable [https://wikiless.tiekoetter.com/wiki/Science?lang=fr scientifically]. These paranormal phenomena are the object of study of [https://wikiless.tiekoetter.com/wiki/Parapsychologie?lang=fr parapsychology]. The prefix "para" designates something that is "beside", on the fringe of the "normal", which may refer to [https://wikiless.tiekoetter.com/wiki/Consensus_scientifique?lang=fr scientific consensus] or normality. Since these phenomena have no proof of existence, [https://wikiless.tiekoetter.com/wiki/Imagination?lang=fr imagination] and supposition have free rein.”</blockquote>
<div class="reference-citation">Author not entered, ''Wikipedia''.</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +
1272<><div style="font-size: 90%;">''No content has been entered yet.''</div><><>Even if migrant unemployment is high, it's not high enough to offset the benefits.-¡-Even if migrant unemployment is high, it's not high enough to offset the benefits.<>0<>1<><><> +
560<><div>
That's what Lawrence Krauss says in his book "A Universe from Nothing" or in his lecture on Youtube.</div><div style="margin-top: 0.75em; font-size: 103%;">'''References'''</div><ul class="references-argument"><li>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUGeEbDC9Uk Lawrence Krauss - A Universe from Nothing VOST Français].</li></ul><><><>0<>0<><><> +
A whole section of the left has become the useful idiot of globalist capitalism and is supported by finance and GAFAM. +
1379<><div>
In the United States, the Democratic left is largely supported by finance and GAFAM. As for French big business, it has been up in arms against the RN for years. As Michéa has shown, a large part of the left has become liberal and allied with the liberals. They would have us believe that those who oppose globalization and mass migration are fascists, but this is nothing more than a political strategy to neutralize the reactions of the working classes.</div><blockquote>“Joe Biden, the Democratic candidate for the White House, has received more than $74 million in contributions from financial institutions or Wall Street personalities for the 2020 campaign, according to data from [https://www.opensecrets.org/about/ Center for Responsive Politics (CRP)] , an independent institute specializing in political finance analysis. [https://www.lesechos.fr/monde/etats-unis/presidentielle-americaine-le-mandat-de-trump-en-huit-questions-1259203 The President of the United States] (Trump) has raised just over $18 million from the financial community, four times less than his rival.”</blockquote>
<div class="reference-citation">Author not entered, “[https://www.lesechos.fr/monde/ameriques/wall-street-a-donne-quatre-fois-plus-dargent-a-biden-qua-trump-1260033 Wall Street gave four times more money to Biden than to Trump]”, ''Les Echos'', 28/10/2020.</div><><>The far-right's proposals to curb immigration are cruel and ineffective, and therefore racist.-¡-The ineffectiveness of the far-right's migration policy is enough to disqualify this argument. -;- Social networks profit from hate and harassment-¡-Far-right ideas are very profitable for GAFAM, so they have no interest in censoring them. -;- The financing of the Democratic Party by the money powers is a blight on Democratic voters themselves.-¡-The funding of the Democratic Party by the money powers is a means of muzzling it, not proof of so-called "leftism." -;- The far right has no interest in tackling the causes of migration-¡-The far right accusing the left of favoring immigration is like the hospital laughing at the charity. -;- The bourgeoisie is a historic ally of identitarians-¡-Liberal elites have always been infatuated with the far right. -;- Many allegations of censorship are fake news-¡-The far right invents censorship that doesn't exist<>0<>6<><><>
1038<><div style="font-size: 90%;">''No content has been entered yet.''</div><><>To believe without proof is irrational-¡-To believe without proof is irrational -;- With such a method, we could validate anything and everything-¡-We could validate parody religions with the same type of argument -;- By the same reasoning, we should be led to believe in the existence of teapots orbiting the Sun.-¡-By the same reasoning, we should be led to believe in the existence of teapots orbiting the Sun.<>0<>3<><><> +
935<><div style="font-size: 90%;">''No content has been entered yet.''</div><><>God is not an abstract object, for he is the cause of events in the world.-¡-God is not an abstract object, for he is the cause of events in the world.<>0<>1<><><> +
1519<><div style="font-size: 90%;">''No content has been entered yet.''</div><><><>0<>0<><><> +