A paranormal concept ceases to qualify as such as soon as science validates it.

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: this page title ends with a period. Rename the page to remove the point.
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument againstThis argument is an objection to Parapsychology is a recognized science in the USA.
Keywords: none[ edit ].

SummarySummary

[ edit ]
Scientific invalidity is a sine qua non for applying the "paranormal" label.

QuotationsQuotes

[ edit ]

“The paranormal is a term used to describe a set of supposed phenomena that are neither observable nor explicable scientifically. These paranormal phenomena are the object of study of parapsychology. The prefix "para" designates something that is "beside", on the fringe of the "normal", which may refer to scientific consensus or normality. Since these phenomena have no proof of existence, imagination and supposition have free rein.”

Author not entered, Wikipedia.

ReferencesReferences

[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustifications

[ edit ]
    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjections

[ edit ]
    No objections have been entered yet.

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=A_paranormal_concept_ceases_to_qualify_as_such_as_soon_as_science_validates_it.&oldid=7368"