Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
All debates
Random debate
Creating a debate
Recent changes
About
About Wikidebates
Founding Principles
Contact us
Texts
Democracy's Missing Link
What is Methodical Debate?
Beyond Complexity
The 21st Century Agora
Search
Search
Appearance
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Contents
move to sidebar
hide
Beginning
1
Summary
2
Quotes
3
References
4
Justifications
5
Objections
6
Parent debate
Toggle the table of contents
"National identity" is a fuzzy notion, just as foggy as "soul".
Article
Discussion
English
Read
Source
History
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Source
History
Refresh
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link
Page information
Browse properties
From Wikidebates
Warning: this page title ends with a dot.
Rename page
This argument is used in the debate :
Is there such a thing as a national identity?
.
This argument is a “con” argument in the debate :
Is there such a thing as a national identity?
.
Keywords
:
none
.
Summary
No summary has been entered yet.
Quotes
No quotes have been entered yet.
References
No references have been entered yet.
Justifications
No arguments have been entered yet.
＋ Add an argument
Objections
To exist, national identity doesn't have to be rational or sensible.
＋ Add an objection
Parent debate
Is there such a thing as a national identity?
rename
Edit
Categories
:
Arguments
Argument titles ending with a dot
Arguments without references
Hidden categories:
Pages with short description
Arguments without section
Arguments without keyword
Arguments without summary
Arguments without quote
Arguments without justification
Arguments without content
Search
Search
Toggle the table of contents
"National identity" is a fuzzy notion, just as foggy as "soul".
Add topic
