Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• If order were a projection of the human mind, scientific prediction would be impossible.  + (636)
• Science explains the order and complexity of the world  + (637)
• Science will never be able to explain certain fundamental phenomena such as life or consciousness.  + (638)
• Some things that were once thought to be beyond scientific explanation have become so.  + (639)
• A God in the image of man is too human to be credible  + (640)
• God may very well be anthropomorphic, even if this is hardly credible.  + (641)
• Comparing God to man is a legitimate analogy in a certain sense.  + (642)
• God is in man's image because man is in God's image  + (643)
• The physical-teleological argument does not prove the existence of a creator god, but only of an ordering demiurge.  + (644)
• Beware of analogies used to show the existence of a god  + (645)
• God explains the laws of nature  + (646)
• The laws of nature are constructs of the human mind  + (647)
• The laws of the universe have been built up little by little  + (648)
• Physical laws are consequences of the properties of matter  + (649)
• Many religious explanations have been replaced by scientific ones.  + (650)
• Cases described as demonic possessions are now seen as simple mental disorders.  + (651)
• The biblical accounts are consistent with the paucity of human knowledge at the time they were written.  + (652)
• Science cannot explain the existence of physical phenomena and laws  + (653)
• The inexplicability of a phenomenon by science lends credence to the thesis of a filler god  + (654)
• Religious answers will always be more biased than scientific ones  + (655)
• It's more rational to admit our ignorance than to invent an explanation out of nowhere.  + (656)
• Science has never claimed to have all the answers.  + (657)
• Certain future explanations of science are taking shape that run counter to materialism.  + (658)
• Speculative science is not real science  + (659)
• Pseudoscience uses a disguised version of quantum physics to give itself a veneer of legitimacy  + (660)

• Before you can explain a phenomenon, you must first prove that it exists.  + (661)

• Contemporary science is shaking the philosophical foundations on which materialism rests.  + (662)
• Even if matter is no longer represented as it was in the classical age, this does not mean that it was created by God.  + (663)
• Many cosmological models postulate that the universe did not have an absolute beginning, and was therefore not created by God.  + (664)
• Many renowned scientists confess their perplexity and tend towards a spiritualist vision of the universe in the face of contemporary discoveries.  + (665)
• An argument from authority is not proof  + (666)
• Being a scientist doesn't make you immune to obscurantism  + (667)
• The laws of nature, like natural selection, don't need God, just chance and a lot of time.  + (668)
• God explains the highly improbable adjustment of the universe's fundamental constants  + (669)
• Our universe is only one of many existing universes  + (670)
• Mathematical theories of probability show that fine-tuning the laws of the universe is relatively probable  + (671)
• That God has succeeded in adjusting the laws of the universe is at least as improbable as its existence.  + (672)
• God explains the appearance of life  + (673)
• There are a very large number of planets suitable for life  + (674)
• Ecosia fights deforestation  + (691)
• Ecosia is an alternative to Google  + (692)
• A Google search consumes less CO2 than an Ecosia search  + (693)
• Can be used to elect a constituent assembly and/or an assembly to replace the senate.  + (694)
• You don't need any funding or support to be a candidate.  + (695)
• Enables greater public participation in political life.  + (696)
• An election campaign followed by an election are combined with a draw.  + (697)
• We need a higher birth rate to ensure pensions  + (698)
• We need a high birth rate if France is to remain a world power.  + (699)
• More births are needed to boost the economy  + (700)
• We need a high birth rate to remain a dynamic, young country  + (701)
• If we don't boost the birth rate, we'll have to bring in millions of migrants.  + (702)