Certain future explanations of science are taking shape that run counter to materialism.

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument againstThis argument is an objection to God is but the name of our ignorance.
Keywords: none[ edit ].


In the case of near-death experiences, for example, the most obvious scientific explanations have failed. These IMEs call for new scientific explanations: according to some, the explanation of IMEs would only be possible within a quantum framework, assuming that consciousness is non-local and immortal. This shows that future scientific explanations are not necessarily in line with materialism, and may even oppose it.



Arguments forJustifications

Arguments againstObjections

  • Argument againstSpeculative science is not real science
  • Argument againstPseudoscience uses a disguised version of quantum physics to give itself a veneer of legitimacy
  • Argument againstBefore you can explain a phenomenon, you must first prove that it exists.

Parent debateParent debate