At no point does the flood story explain why God destroys all the animals not on the ark, when it's only man he's after.

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: this page title ends with a period. Rename the page to remove the point.
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument forThis argument is a justification of The Flood story is riddled with inconsistencies, making it highly improbable..
Keywords: none[ edit ].

SummarySummary

[ edit ]
No summary has been entered yet.

QuotationsQuotes

[ edit ]

“The LORD saw that the wickedness of men was great on earth, and that all the thoughts of their hearts turned to evil every day. The LORD repented that he had made man on the earth, and was grieved in his heart. And the LORD said: I will cut off from the face of the earth man whom I have created, from man to cattle, creeping things and birds of the air; for I repent that I have made them.”

Author not entered, “Genesis 6.5 to 6.8”.

ReferencesReferences

[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustifications

[ edit ]
    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjections

[ edit ]
    No objections have been entered yet.

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=At_no_point_does_the_flood_story_explain_why_God_destroys_all_the_animals_not_on_the_ark,_when_it%27s_only_man_he%27s_after.&oldid=9344"