The fight against the extreme right is often misused as a useful tool for globalization.

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: this page title ends with a period. Rename the page to remove the point.
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does being on the left necessarily mean being in favor of mass immigration?.
Argument forThis argument is a justification of Mass immigration is a by-product of unbridled liberalism and globalization.
Keywords: none[ edit ].

SummarySummaryedit

Globalist capitalists want to create a large European market and open the EU's borders to people. Just as French bosses demanded more immigration from Giscard in the 1970s, today's bosses want a liberal world, with free movement of capital, goods and people. So they label all those who oppose this capitalist project as "racists" and "reactionaries". They use far-left movements as useful idiots for their agenda. It's no coincidence that Soros funds pro-migrant NGOs, that employers make statements against the RN, and that the most capitalist and globalist leaders fight against any sovereignist movement.

QuotationsQuotesedit

“[...] of course, the FN is silent on the responsibility of big business, which went looking for these foreigners in their countries of origin. No class analysis, of course, and consequently nothing on the processes of exploitation that exacerbate inequalities between immigrants and nationals. The Socialist Party, for its part, has become the shield of neoliberal capitalism. After burying Marxism and the class struggle, and converting to the market economy, the left-wing hegemony of the PS has rendered any criticism of immigration as "far-right". In total opposition to the FN, immigration is defended as an enrichment for the country, ignoring the reasons and responsibilities behind migration, as with its adversary. From now on, it's all about morality and individuals. Finally, we mustn't forget that labor immigration has been replaced by family immigration, the main source of immigration with few or no qualifications. The new waves of immigration bring with them a workforce that has to compete with previous waves of immigration.

Finding a new paradigm'

While France has hovered between 8% and 10% unemployment for the past 30 years, the MEDEF continues to advocate the recruitment of foreigners[13][14][15]. The political refugee is also seen from an economic angle[16]. The hiring of illegal immigrants is encouraged by the European Commission, trade unions and employers via the French Office for Immigration and Integration[17]. It is much in demand in the hotel industry[18].”

Author not entered, “Immigration and employers, a history of French politics”, Le Monde moderne, 1/07/2021.

ReferencesReferencesedit

No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustificationsedit

    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjectionsedit

  • Argument againstThe ineffectiveness of the far-right's migration policy is enough to disqualify this argument.
  • Argument againstThe far right "forgets" that it itself paved the way for migratory crises
  • Argument againstThe far right is in no position to claim to be anti-capitalist
  • Argument againstThe left is not "pro-immigration", it just wants migrants to be treated humanely until the cause of their migration is resolved.
  • Argument againstIt's ridiculous to accuse associations dedicated to the duty of remembrance of complicity with capitalism.
  • Argument againstBy stirring up the "woke question", the far right makes itself the useful idiot of the powerful it claims to be fighting.
  • Argument againstRejection of migrants serves the interests of big business
  • Argument againstIt's not up to the far right itself to define what constitutes a "fight against the rogue far right".

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=The_fight_against_the_extreme_right_is_often_misused_as_a_useful_tool_for_globalization.&oldid=7841"