No evidence of a god

Keywords: God.

Summary

In our common experience, we don't perceive God; history is not influenced by any kind of providence, but is the result of human actions; nature is indifferent, with failures (species that have disappeared without descendants, bushy development, etc.). To support the idea of God, religions offer only uncertain reasoning, irrational "faith" (which contradicts the faith of other religions) or subjective, more or less illusory experiences (mystical experiences). The hypothesis of God is therefore gratuitous.

Quotes

No quotes have been entered yet.

References

No references have been entered yet.

Justifications

• It's up to the person who advances a thesis to prove it.
• No experiment proves the existence of God
• Awakening experiences show that there is no god
• There are no "back worlds" where God would stand
• If God existed, there should be clear evidence of it.
• God is too complex a hypothesis
• God is a useless hypothesis
• Arguments in favor of the existence of God are just as much in favor of the existence of parody religions.

Objections

• Nothing proves the non-existence of God
• Absence of proof is not proof of absence
• God's existence is revealed in sacred texts
• Some people say they have experienced God
• Many people believe in God, including famous scientists
• God's existence cannot be grasped through evidence
• The universe is not self-sufficient

Parent debate

• Does God exist?