No experiment proves the existence of God

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument forThis argument is a justification of No evidence of a god.
Keywords: God[ edit ].



“Weakness of the proofs, then, since they are not proofs. But also, and above all, the weakness of experiments. This is my second argument, always negative. It's more important to me than the previous one. When it comes to matters of fact, experience is more decisive than reasoning. One of my main reasons for not believing in God is that I have no experience of him. It's the simplest argument. It's one of the strongest.”

André Comte-Sponville, The spirit of atheism, Albin Michel.


Arguments forJustifications

Arguments againstObjections

Parent debateParent debate