God is too complex a hypothesis

From Wikidebates
Wikidebates, the encyclopedia of “pro” and “con” arguments
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument forThis argument is a justification of No evidence of a god.
Keywords: God[ edit ].

SummarySummary
[ edit ]

Ockham's razor principle: if two hypotheses explain the same set of phenomena, the simpler hypothesis (the non-existence of God) is to be preferred.

QuotationsQuotes
[ edit ]

No quotes have been entered yet.

ReferencesReferences
[ edit ]

No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustifications
[ edit ]

    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjections
[ edit ]

  • Argument againstAtheism doesn't account for first cause
  • Argument againstThe theistic hypothesis is simple and elegant

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=God_is_too_complex_a_hypothesis&oldid=7247"