God is too complex a hypothesis

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument forThis argument is a justification of No evidence of a god.
Keywords: God[ edit ].

SummarySummary

[ edit ]
Ockham's razor principle: if two hypotheses explain the same set of phenomena, the simpler hypothesis (the non-existence of God) is to be preferred.

QuotationsQuotes

[ edit ]
No quotes have been entered yet.

ReferencesReferences

[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustifications

[ edit ]
    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjections

[ edit ]
  • Argument againstAtheism doesn't account for first cause
  • Argument againstThe theistic hypothesis is simple and elegant

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=God_is_too_complex_a_hypothesis&oldid=7247"