God is too complex a hypothesis

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument forThis argument is a justification of No evidence of a god.
Keywords: God[ edit ].

SummarySummaryedit

Ockham's razor principle: if two hypotheses explain the same set of phenomena, the simpler hypothesis (the non-existence of God) is to be preferred.

QuotationsQuotesedit

No quotes have been entered yet.

ReferencesReferencesedit

No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustificationsedit

    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjectionsedit

  • Argument againstAtheism doesn't account for first cause
  • Argument againstThe theistic hypothesis is simple and elegant

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=God_is_too_complex_a_hypothesis&oldid=7247"