Inventing a new interpretation of an expression to maintain a semblance of coherence in an argument is a post-hoc argument.

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: this page title ends with a period. Rename the page to remove the point.
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument againstThis argument is an objection to Subjective term.
Keywords: none[ edit ].

SummarySummaryedit

No summary has been entered yet.

QuotationsQuotesedit

No quotes have been entered yet.

ReferencesReferencesedit

No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustificationsedit

    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjectionsedit

    No objections have been entered yet.

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Inventing_a_new_interpretation_of_an_expression_to_maintain_a_semblance_of_coherence_in_an_argument_is_a_post-hoc_argument.&oldid=9282"