Is Ecosia an eco-friendly search engine?

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Balance of reason weighing pros and cons
This article aims to expose all the pros and cons of the debate “Is Ecosia an eco-friendly search engine?”, to allow everyone to form a critical and informed opinion.
Searchtool.svg
 Further reading: Founding Principles
List of arguments
This page is a debate draft. This is a more or less organized list of arguments.
Please feel free to contribute to this draft.
Argument forEcosia fights deforestation
Argument forEcosia is an alternative to Google
Argument againstA Google search consumes less CO2
Keywords : search engine, Ecosia, reforestation[ edit ].

To understand the debateTo understand the debate

[ edit ]

IntroductionPresentation

Ecosia is a search engine created in 2009. Search results are based on Bing. Through advertising, the company donates over 80% of its profits to reforestation programs around the world.
Wikipedia.svg
 See also: Ecosia on Wikipedia [ edit ]

Arguments for

[ edit ]
  • Argument forEcosia fights deforestation
  • Argument forEcosia is an alternative to Google

Arguments against

[ edit ]
  • Argument againstA Google search consumes less CO2

To go furtherTo go further

BibliographyBibliography

For“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Against“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Neither for nor againstNeither “” nor “” [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

WebliographyWebliography

For“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Against“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Neither for nor againstNeither “” nor “” [ edit ]

VideographyVideography

For“” side [ edit ]
Against“” side [ edit ]
Neither for nor againstNeither “” nor “” [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
[ edit ]
Show the latest changes in the debate
Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Is_Ecosia_an_eco-friendly_search_engine%3F&oldid=6246"