Should we boycott GAFAM?

PROS

GAFAMs are undemocratic

GAFAM abuse their monopoly

CONS

GAFAM offers simple, effective tools

There's no alternative to GAFAM

Keywords: google, Facebook, amazon, apple, microsoft.

Warnings

This article aims to present all the pros and cons of the debate “Should we boycott GAFAM?”, to help everyone form a critical, informed opinion.

Learn more: Founding Principles

This page is a debate draft. This is a more or less organized list of arguments.

Please feel free to contribute to this draft.

To understand the debate

Definition

GAFAM is the acronym used to designate Google Apple Facebook Amazon Microsoft, and, by extension, other multinationals of equivalent power providing similar services.

See also: Google and Template:Article WikipédiaTemplate:Article WikipédiaTemplate:Article WikipédiaTemplate:Article Wikipédia on Wikipedia

Pros

What are the pros of ?

• GAFAMs are undemocratic
• GAFAM abuse their monopoly

Cons

What are the cons of ?

• GAFAM offers simple, effective tools
• There's no alternative to GAFAM

Further reading

Bibliography

“Pro” side

No references have been entered yet.

“Con” side

No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”

No references have been entered yet.

Webliography

“Pro” side

No references have been entered yet.

“Con” side

No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”

No references have been entered yet.

Videography

“Pro” side

No references have been entered yet.

“Con” side

No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”

No references have been entered yet.