Assertion without argument
[ rename ][ 
]
[ rename ][ ]
Wikidebates, the encyclopedia of “pro” and “con” arguments
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
The title of this argument is incomplete. It is ambiguous or incomprehensible on its own. Rewrite the title as a complete sentence that gives a clear and precise idea of the argument.
|
This argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
This argument is an objection to The Bible claims that the universe has existed for 6,000 years, which is false..
Summary[ edit ]
That's what we call a baseless assertion ...! Carbon 14 is not a reliable dating method ...! And the geological past is not perfectly identified, especially to demonstrate that there was no flood, according to the biblical account ...!
Quotes[ edit ]
References[ edit ]
Justifications[ edit ]
Objections[ edit ]
-
The Flood story is riddled with inconsistencies, making it highly improbable.
-
Dating methods are far more reliable than a mythological story written by men and distorted by successive translations and rewritings.
-
There is no geological or archaeological evidence of the Flood to date, which is enough to consider it a mythological tale.