Assertion without argument

The title of this argument is incomplete. It is ambiguous or not understandable on its own.

Rewrite the title as a complete sentence that clearly and precisely conveys the argument.

Keywords: God, flood, 6000 years.

Summary

That's what we call a baseless assertion ...! Carbon 14 is not a reliable dating method ...! And the geological past is not perfectly identified, especially to demonstrate that there was no flood, according to the biblical account ...!

Quotes

No quotes have been entered yet.

References

No references have been entered yet.

Justifications

No arguments have been entered yet.

Objections

• The Flood story is riddled with inconsistencies, making it highly improbable.
• Dating methods are far more reliable than a mythological story written by men and distorted by successive translations and rewritings.
• There is no geological or archaeological evidence of the Flood to date, which is enough to consider it a mythological tale.

Parent debate

• Does God exist?