Assertion without argument

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Does this page title give a clear and precise idea of the argument? Rename the page if not.
The title of this argument is incomplete. It is ambiguous or incomprehensible on its own.
Rewrite the title as a complete sentence that gives a clear and precise idea of the argument.
Searchtool.svg
 Detailed article: Help:Correcting an incomplete argument title
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument againstThis argument is an objection to The Bible claims that the universe has existed for 6,000 years, which is false..
Keywords: God, flood, 6000 years[ edit ].

SummarySummary

[ edit ]
That's what we call a baseless assertion ...! Carbon 14 is not a reliable dating method ...! And the geological past is not perfectly identified, especially to demonstrate that there was no flood, according to the biblical account ...!

QuotationsQuotes

[ edit ]
No quotes have been entered yet.

ReferencesReferences

[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustifications

[ edit ]
    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjections

[ edit ]
  • Argument againstThe Flood story is riddled with inconsistencies, making it highly improbable.
  • Argument againstDating methods are far more reliable than a mythological story written by men and distorted by successive translations and rewritings.
  • Argument againstThere is no geological or archaeological evidence of the Flood to date, which is enough to consider it a mythological tale.

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Assertion_without_argument&oldid=9341"