|
This article aims to expose all the pros and cons of the debate “Is there such a thing as a national identity?”, to allow everyone to form a critical and informed opinion.
|
|
This page is a debate draft. This is a more or less organized list of arguments. Please feel free to contribute to this draft.
|
To understand the debate
No introduction has been entered yet.

[ +
Add a link ] to a useful Wikipedia page to complement this introduction.
Pros
What are the pros of the existence of a national identity?
-
It is based on a common language and culture
-
It stems from the history
-
It corresponds to the customs of the country
-
It expresses a country's vision
-
It corresponds to the country's mentality or national character.
-
It's the soul of a country
-
People have always sought a national identity
Cons
What are the cons of the existence of a national identity?
-
"National identity" is a fuzzy notion, just as foggy as "soul".
-
National identity is simply the sum of a country's inhabitants at a given time.
-
Today's countries are multicultural and no longer have a homogeneous identity.
-
National identity is fluid and constantly redefined
-
-
The nature of a country is a set of laws and institutions.
-
National identity is a dangerous populist fantasy
To go further
Bibliography
No references have been entered yet.
No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”
[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Webliography
No references have been entered yet.
No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”
[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Videography
No references have been entered yet.
No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”
[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
No related debates have been entered yet.
Show the latest changes in the debate