Is there such a thing as a national identity?

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Balance of reason weighing pros and cons
This article aims to expose all the pros and cons of the debate “Is there such a thing as a national identity?”, to allow everyone to form a critical and informed opinion.
Searchtool.svg
 Further reading: Founding Principles
List of arguments
This page is a debate draft. This is a more or less organized list of arguments.
Please feel free to contribute to this draft.
Argument forIt is based on a common language and culture
Argument forIt stems from the history
Argument forIt corresponds to the customs of the country
Argument forIt expresses a country's vision
Argument forIt corresponds to the country's mentality or national character.
Argument forIt's the soul of a country
Argument forPeople have always sought a national identity
Argument against"National identity" is a fuzzy notion, just as foggy as "soul".
Argument againstNational identity is simply the sum of a country's inhabitants at a given time.
Argument againstToday's countries are multicultural and no longer have a homogeneous identity.
Argument againstNational identity is fluid and constantly redefined
Argument againstThere is no transcendent essence or figure of a country
Argument againstThe nature of a country is a set of laws and institutions.
Argument againstNational identity is a dangerous populist fantasy
Keywords : Identity, National Identity, Belonging, Politics, Nationalism, Borders, Multiculturalism[ edit ].

To understand the debateTo understand the debate

[ edit ]

No introduction has been entered yet.

Wikipedia.svg[ + Add a link ] to a useful Wikipedia page to complement this introduction.

Arguments for

[ edit ]
  • Argument forIt is based on a common language and culture
  • Argument forIt stems from the history
  • Argument forIt corresponds to the customs of the country
  • Argument forIt expresses a country's vision
  • Argument forIt corresponds to the country's mentality or national character.
  • Argument forIt's the soul of a country
  • Argument forPeople have always sought a national identity

Arguments against

[ edit ]
  • Argument against"National identity" is a fuzzy notion, just as foggy as "soul".
  • Argument againstNational identity is simply the sum of a country's inhabitants at a given time.
  • Argument againstToday's countries are multicultural and no longer have a homogeneous identity.
  • Argument againstNational identity is fluid and constantly redefined
  • Argument againstThere is no transcendent essence or figure of a country
  • Argument againstThe nature of a country is a set of laws and institutions.
  • Argument againstNational identity is a dangerous populist fantasy

To go furtherTo go further

BibliographyBibliography

For“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Against“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Neither for nor againstNeither “” nor “” [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

WebliographyWebliography

For“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Against“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Neither for nor againstNeither “” nor “” [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

VideographyVideography

For“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Against“” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Neither for nor againstNeither “” nor “” [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
[ edit ]
No related debates have been entered yet.
Show the latest changes in the debate
Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Is_there_such_a_thing_as_a_national_identity%3F&oldid=6056"