We can't stop immigration
[ rename ][ 
]
[ rename ][ ]
Wikidebates, the encyclopedia of “pro” and “con” arguments
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This argument is used in the debates Does being on the left necessarily mean being in favor of mass immigration? and Should we accept immigration?.
This argument is a “pro” argument in the debate Should we accept immigration?.
This argument is a “con” argument in the debate Does being on the left necessarily mean being in favor of mass immigration?.This argument is a justification of The far-right's proposals to curb immigration are cruel and ineffective, and therefore racist..This argument is an objection to Neoliberals support mass immigration.
Summary[ edit ]
Quotes[ edit ]
“In an increasingly unequal and violent world, no sea or wall can stop human beings from seeking a better life. By preventing them from moving and settling freely, we only make their lives even more unbearable.”
Nathalie Arthaud, Communist, revolutionary, internationalist!, The right characters, 2022.
Template:CitationTemplate:Citation
References[ edit ]
Justifications[ edit ]
-
We can't close the borders
-
We can't send them back to their countries (for legal reasons).
-
Global warming will lead to major migrations
-
If migrants are willing to take such risks, it's because they have no choice.
-
Whatever measures are taken to close borders, poor people will still migrate
-
France, like Europe, has been built up by perpetual waves of immigration.
-
The direction of history is globalization
-
Migration has always existed
-
The idea of controllable immigration is a fantasy fed by demagogic politicians.
Objections[ edit ]
-
It's a question of political will (Australia, Japan)