The "woke" are censored far more often than their opponents
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This argument is used in the debate Does being on the left necessarily mean being in favor of mass immigration?.
This argument is a justification of Wrong, it's anti-wokism that censors its opponents.
This argument is used in the debate Does being on the left necessarily mean being in favor of mass immigration?.This argument is a justification of Wrong, it's anti-wokism that censors its opponents.Keywords: none
Summary
Quotes
“Of course, "child protection" is the new banner for homophobes everywhere. Following on from the "anti-gay propaganda" law passed in Russia in 2013, which has already made inroads in Hungary and Poland, the state of Florida (south-eastern USA) has begun examining a law aimed at banning the teaching of LGBTQI+ themes in schools. If passed, this law would result in an outright ban on courses on the history of LGBTQI+ struggles or debates concerning LGBTQI+ identities, reports ABC.”
Nicolas Scheffer, “"Don't say gay": Florida takes its turn attacking LGBTQI+ subjects in school”, Têtu Mag, 31/01/2022.
References
Justifications
-
The fallacious argument of "promoting homosexuality" is used to pass the pill of censorship of LGBTQ content.
Objections
-
At French universities, cases of censorship in the name of wokism are multiplying. -
We must have the right to refuse to let LGBT people spread their ideas in schools
-
Refusing certain content at primary or secondary school is not censorship: not everything is taught at school.