Edit debate introduction of: Should we stop eating animals?

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

This introductory part must provide in a synthetic way the elements necessary to understand this debate.

To add a section to this introduction: click on the "Add a subsection" button at the bottom of this page and fill in the "Title" and "Text" fields.

To modify an existing section: place the mouse in the field that interests you and make the necessary modifications.

To change the order of items: click on the dotted bar to the left of the item you want to move, hold down the click, place your cursor at the desired location and release the click.

To delete a section: click on the cross in the black circle that appears at the top right of the section.

Briefly describe the changes you made in the “Edit summary” field at the bottom of this page, and click the “Save” button.

Subsection title Structure the introduction into different subsections such as: Definition(s) → to know what we are talking about; Actors of the debate → to present the main protagonists of the debate; History of the debate → to retrace the history of the debate; News of the debate → to recall the events that fuel this debate; Issues of the debate → why this debate is important in history or in the news.
Subsection content Write here the text corresponding to the title you have chosen for this subsection.	Antispeciesism is a movement dating back to the 1970s, which asserts that the species to which an animal belongs is not a relevant criterion for deciding how it should be treated and the moral consideration it should be given.
Warning(s) If certain aspects of this subsection are problematic, please notify readers by checking the corresponding box(es): Sub-part too long: this sub-part is not synthetic enough or must be divided into different sub-parts; To be developed: this subsection is incomplete or too telegraphic; Unclear: this sub-section is too obscure or jargon; Partisan: this subsection is not neutral enough because it favors one camp ("pro" or "con") to the detriment of the other; Missing reference(s): some little-known facts or quotations are not sourced; Style to review: this sub-section is written in a style that is too personal or, on the contrary, too little literary.	Too long To develop Unclear Partisan Missing references Style to review

Subsection title Structure the introduction into different subsections such as: Definition(s) → to know what we are talking about; Actors of the debate → to present the main protagonists of the debate; History of the debate → to retrace the history of the debate; News of the debate → to recall the events that fuel this debate; Issues of the debate → why this debate is important in history or in the news.
Subsection content Write here the text corresponding to the title you have chosen for this subsection.	Veganism is the doctrine that humans should live without exploiting animals, according to the Vegan Society, founded in 1944. It is a way of life based on vegetarianism, which is a very old way of life. Nevertheless, veganism has been gaining in prominence recently, with some well-known public figures going vegan, even if it remains a minority.
Warning(s) If certain aspects of this subsection are problematic, please notify readers by checking the corresponding box(es): Sub-part too long: this sub-part is not synthetic enough or must be divided into different sub-parts; To be developed: this subsection is incomplete or too telegraphic; Unclear: this sub-section is too obscure or jargon; Partisan: this subsection is not neutral enough because it favors one camp ("pro" or "con") to the detriment of the other; Missing reference(s): some little-known facts or quotations are not sourced; Style to review: this sub-section is written in a style that is too personal or, on the contrary, too little literary.	Too long To develop Unclear Partisan Missing references Style to review

Subsection title Structure the introduction into different subsections such as: Definition(s) → to know what we are talking about; Actors of the debate → to present the main protagonists of the debate; History of the debate → to retrace the history of the debate; News of the debate → to recall the events that fuel this debate; Issues of the debate → why this debate is important in history or in the news.
Subsection content Write here the text corresponding to the title you have chosen for this subsection.	In classical biology, an animal is a living being that feeds on organic substances. Today, the term "animal" is reserved for complex, multicellular beings.
Warning(s) If certain aspects of this subsection are problematic, please notify readers by checking the corresponding box(es): Sub-part too long: this sub-part is not synthetic enough or must be divided into different sub-parts; To be developed: this subsection is incomplete or too telegraphic; Unclear: this sub-section is too obscure or jargon; Partisan: this subsection is not neutral enough because it favors one camp ("pro" or "con") to the detriment of the other; Missing reference(s): some little-known facts or quotations are not sourced; Style to review: this sub-section is written in a style that is too personal or, on the contrary, too little literary.	Too long To develop Unclear Partisan Missing references Style to review

Subsection title Structure the introduction into different subsections such as: Definition(s) → to know what we are talking about; Actors of the debate → to present the main protagonists of the debate; History of the debate → to retrace the history of the debate; News of the debate → to recall the events that fuel this debate; Issues of the debate → why this debate is important in history or in the news.
Subsection content Write here the text corresponding to the title you have chosen for this subsection.	Animal welfare is broken down into five freedoms corresponding to the animal's fundamental needs: * physiological freedom (absence of hunger and thirst), * environmental freedom (absence of discomfort), * Sanitary freedom (freedom from disease and injury), * Behavioral freedom (the right to express normal animal behavior), * psychological freedom (absence of fear and anxiety).
Warning(s) If certain aspects of this subsection are problematic, please notify readers by checking the corresponding box(es): Sub-part too long: this sub-part is not synthetic enough or must be divided into different sub-parts; To be developed: this subsection is incomplete or too telegraphic; Unclear: this sub-section is too obscure or jargon; Partisan: this subsection is not neutral enough because it favors one camp ("pro" or "con") to the detriment of the other; Missing reference(s): some little-known facts or quotations are not sourced; Style to review: this sub-section is written in a style that is too personal or, on the contrary, too little literary.	Too long To develop Unclear Partisan Missing references Style to review

Add a subsection

Edit summary:

Click on the operation(s) you performed so contributors can quickly understand your changes:

Added content
Deleted content
Correction
Reorganization
Style improvement

This summary will appear in the page's history, as well as in the recent changes feed.

This is a minor edit

Watch this page

Cancel