Edit debate introduction of: Should we debate with the enemy?

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Which famous collaborative encyclopedia inspired Wikidebates ?

This introductory part must provide in a synthetic way the elements necessary to understand this debate.

To add a section to this introduction: click on the "Add a subsection" button at the bottom of this page and fill in the "Title" and "Text" fields.

To modify an existing section: place the mouse in the field that interests you and make the necessary modifications.

To change the order of items: click on the dotted bar to the left of the item you want to move, hold down the click, place your cursor at the desired location and release the click.

To delete a section: click on the cross in the black circle that appears at the top right of the section.

Briefly describe the changes you made in the “Edit summary” field at the bottom of this page, and click the “Save” button.

Subsection title Structure the introduction into different subsections such as: Definition(s) → to know what we are talking about; Actors of the debate → to present the main protagonists of the debate; History of the debate → to retrace the history of the debate; News of the debate → to recall the events that fuel this debate; Issues of the debate → why this debate is important in history or in the news.
Subsection content Write here the text corresponding to the title you have chosen for this subsection.	On the one hand, advocates of a debate with the enemy believe that it is healthy to confront arguments that don't go our way, in order to improve the quality of our own arguments and objectivity. They also believe that it is harmful to leave a dangerous ideology unchallenged, and that the undecided can always be convinced. Detractors, on the other hand, believe that such debates are doomed to failure and give visibility to opposing views.
Warning(s) If certain aspects of this subsection are problematic, please notify readers by checking the corresponding box(es): Sub-part too long: this sub-part is not synthetic enough or must be divided into different sub-parts; To be developed: this subsection is incomplete or too telegraphic; Unclear: this sub-section is too obscure or jargon; Partisan: this subsection is not neutral enough because it favors one camp ("pro" or "con") to the detriment of the other; Missing reference(s): some little-known facts or quotations are not sourced; Style to review: this sub-section is written in a style that is too personal or, on the contrary, too little literary.	Too long To develop Unclear Partisan Missing references Style to review

Add a subsection

Edit summary:

Click on the operation(s) you performed so contributors can quickly understand your changes:

Added content
Deleted content
Correction
Reorganization
Style improvement

This summary will appear in the page's history, as well as in the recent changes feed.

This is a minor edit

Watch this page

Cancel

Edit debate introduction of: Should we debate with the enemy?

Navigation menu

Search