Edit the summary of the argument: The notion of "pseudoscience" is highly controversial

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Wikidebates is an encyclopedia of... ?

Write here the simple or complex reasoning behind this argument.

Strive to present the argument clearly and concisely, in its strongest and most convincing version.

Note: Treat here one and only one argument, each argument having to be the object of a distinct page.

Warning banners

Depending on the box you check here, you will add a warning message pointing out the shortcomings of this summary:

Summary to be written: No content has been provided or the text entered corresponds to a note taking.
Arguments to separate: This text mixes arguments that need to be separated. Create a specific page for each of them.
Too long summary: This text contains redundancies, heavy sentences, or is globally too developed.
Unclear summary: This text is confusing, jargon, too complex or too telegraphic.
Disadvantageous summary: The argument is presented in a lacunary or caricatured way. A more convincing version needs to be written.
Style to review: This summary is written in a personal way (“I think that…”) or too familiar.

Summary to be written Arguments to separate Too long summary Unclear summary Disadvantageous summary Style to review

Edit summary:

Click on the operation(s) you performed so contributors can quickly understand your changes:

This summary will appear in the page's history, as well as in the recent changes feed.

This is a minor edit

Watch this page

Navigation menu