Only the hypothesis of God takes us out of solipsism

From Wikidebates
Wikidebates, the encyclopedia of “pro” and “con” arguments
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Keywords: God, Reality, Metaphysical realism, Solipsism[ edit ].

SummarySummary
[ edit ]

The world is essentially deceptive: my senses are fallible, my reasoning is fragile, my opinions fluctuate. Even the feeling of conviction or reality of a thing can be false, as in the case of madmen or when seeing a mirage. What proof do I have that the outside world exists as I see it, and that I'm not in the Matrix? What proof do I have that other people exist, and are not projections of my own mind? How do I know that this world is real, and not just a big dream? This is the question of solipsism. I know I exist ("I think, therefore I am"), but I don't know whether the perceived world is an effect of my mind. To escape this question, I have to posit that my immediate perception is not deceptive, that I'm not crazy; to do this, I have to assume that God guarantees the truth of my immediate impressions. So I have to posit that God exists in order to posit that the world is real.

QuotationsQuotes
[ edit ]

ReferencesReferences
[ edit ]

Arguments forJustifications
[ edit ]

Arguments againstObjections
[ edit ]

  • Argument againstThe world is not deceptive
  • Argument againstTo constitute myself as a subject, I need others
  • Argument againstSolipsism is a false problem

Parent debateParent debate