Jump to content

Non sequitur

From Wikidebates
This argument is used in the debate : Does God exist?.
Keywords: none .

Summary 

The argument claims that "arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases." However, the only justification offered for the claim is a general list of fallacies. No justification has been provided to think that all arguments for the existence of God commit one or more of the listed fallacies.

Quotes 

« A non sequitur fallacy is a statement or conclusion that does not follow logically from what preceded it. Non sequiturs can be responses that have nothing to do with the conversation or flawed conclusions “based” on what preceded them. »

Kassiani Nikolopoulou, « Non Sequitur Fallacy », 05/04/2023

References 

Justifications 

Objections 

Parent debate