Non sequitur
Wikidebates, the encyclopedia of “pro” and “con” arguments
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
[ rename ][ 
]
This argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
This argument is an objection to Arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases.Keywords: none
Summary
The argument claims that "arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases." However, the only justification offered for the claim is a general list of fallacies. No justification has been provided to think that all arguments for the existence of God commit one or more of the listed fallacies.
Quotes
“A non sequitur fallacy is a statement or conclusion that does not follow logically from what preceded it. Non sequiturs can be responses that have nothing to do with the conversation or flawed conclusions “based” on what preceded them.”
Kassiani Nikolopoulou, “Non Sequitur Fallacy”, 05/04/2023.
