|
This article aims to expose all the pros and cons of the debate “Is it necessary to boost the birth rate in France?”, to allow everyone to form a critical and informed opinion.
|
|
This page is a debate draft. This is a more or less organized list of arguments. Please feel free to contribute to this draft.
|
To understand the debate
No introduction has been entered yet.

[ +
Add a link ] to a useful Wikipedia page to complement this introduction.
What are the pros of natalism in France?
-
We need a higher birth rate to ensure pensions
-
We need a high birth rate if France is to remain a world power.
-
More births are needed to boost the economy
-
We need a high birth rate to remain a dynamic, young country
-
If we don't boost the birth rate, we'll have to bring in millions of migrants.
-
France has a lot of rural areas that are empty or too old, and we need to repopulate them.
What are the cons of natalism in France?
-
France is already overpopulated
-
Population growth no longer necessary
-
Demographic decline is good for ecology
-
We'd be happier at 40 million than we are today
-
It's cruel to give birth to a child in a world on the brink of collapse.
-
Birth policies are a danger for women's rights
-
Fertility is sufficiently stable
To go further
Bibliography
No references have been entered yet.
No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”
[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Webliography
No references have been entered yet.
No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”
[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Videography
No references have been entered yet.
No references have been entered yet.

Neither “pro” nor “con”
[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Show the latest changes in the debate