Is it necessary to boost the birth rate in France?

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Balance of reason weighing pros and cons
This article aims to expose all the pros and cons of the debate “Is it necessary to boost the birth rate in France?”, to allow everyone to form a critical and informed opinion.
Searchtool.svg
 Further reading: Founding Principles
List of arguments
This page is a debate draft. This is a more or less organized list of arguments.
Please feel free to contribute to this draft.
PROS
Argument forWe need a higher birth rate to ensure pensions
Argument forWe need a high birth rate if France is to remain a world power.
Argument forMore births are needed to boost the economy
Argument forWe need a high birth rate to remain a dynamic, young country
Argument forIf we don't boost the birth rate, we'll have to bring in millions of migrants.
Argument forFrance has a lot of rural areas that are empty or too old, and we need to repopulate them.
CONS
Argument againstFrance is already overpopulated
Argument againstPopulation growth no longer necessary
Argument againstDemographic decline is good for ecology
Argument againstWe'd be happier at 40 million than we are today
Argument againstIt's cruel to give birth to a child in a world on the brink of collapse.
Argument againstBirth policies are a danger for women's rights
Argument againstFertility is sufficiently stable
Keywords: birth rate[ edit ].

To understand the debateTo understand the debate

[ edit ]

No introduction has been entered yet.

Wikipedia.svg[ + Add a link ] to a useful Wikipedia page to complement this introduction.

Arguments forPros

[ edit ]
What are the pros of natalism in France?
  • Argument forWe need a higher birth rate to ensure pensions
  • Argument forWe need a high birth rate if France is to remain a world power.
  • Argument forMore births are needed to boost the economy
  • Argument forWe need a high birth rate to remain a dynamic, young country
  • Argument forIf we don't boost the birth rate, we'll have to bring in millions of migrants.
  • Argument forFrance has a lot of rural areas that are empty or too old, and we need to repopulate them.

Arguments againstCons

[ edit ]
What are the cons of natalism in France?
  • Argument againstFrance is already overpopulated
  • Argument againstPopulation growth no longer necessary
  • Argument againstDemographic decline is good for ecology
  • Argument againstWe'd be happier at 40 million than we are today
  • Argument againstIt's cruel to give birth to a child in a world on the brink of collapse.
  • Argument againstBirth policies are a danger for women's rights
  • Argument againstFertility is sufficiently stable

To go furtherTo go further

BibliographyBibliography

For“Pro” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Against“Con” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Neither for nor againstNeither “pro” nor “con” [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

WebliographyWebliography

For“Pro” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Against“Con” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Neither for nor againstNeither “pro” nor “con” [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

VideographyVideography

For“Pro” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Against“Con” side [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
Neither for nor againstNeither “pro” nor “con” [ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.
[ edit ]
Show the latest changes in the debate
Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Is_it_necessary_to_boost_the_birth_rate_in_France%3F&oldid=6250"