This is ultracrepidarianism: scientists are good at what they do, but not so good at other things, including the notion of God.

From Wikidebates
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: this page title ends with a period. Rename the page to remove the point.
Parent debateThis argument is used in the debate Does God exist?.
Argument againstThis argument is an objection to Many people believe in God, including famous scientists.
Keywords: none[ edit ].

SummarySummary

[ edit ]

One example is Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for his invention of PCR. But he was a climate skeptic, thought AIDS had nothing to do with HIV, and was a firm believer in astrology.

Quite simply, it's a good idea to listen to a chemist when he's talking about chemical reactions, but not necessarily when it comes to repairing your car.

QuotationsQuotes

[ edit ]
No quotes have been entered yet.

ReferencesReferences

[ edit ]
No references have been entered yet.

Arguments forJustifications

[ edit ]
    No arguments have been entered yet.

Arguments againstObjections

[ edit ]
    No objections have been entered yet.

Parent debateParent debate

Retrieved from "https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=This_is_ultracrepidarianism:_scientists_are_good_at_what_they_do,_but_not_so_good_at_other_things,_including_the_notion_of_God.&oldid=7268"