<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.wikidebates.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jody</id>
	<title>Wikidebates - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.wikidebates.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jody"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikidebates.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jody"/>
	<updated>2026-05-11T09:47:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jody&amp;diff=10573</id>
		<title>User:Jody</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jody&amp;diff=10573"/>
		<updated>2026-04-29T22:12:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jody: Created page with &amp;quot;I release my contributions into the public domain (CC0 1.0) by default, unless stated otherwise, and excluding quotes.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I release my contributions into the public domain (CC0 1.0) by default, unless stated otherwise, and excluding quotes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jody</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Should_recording_the_voices_of_unconsenting_people_be_legal%3F&amp;diff=10572</id>
		<title>Should recording the voices of unconsenting people be legal?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Should_recording_the_voices_of_unconsenting_people_be_legal%3F&amp;diff=10572"/>
		<updated>2026-04-29T22:07:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jody: clarified&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Recording peoples&#039; voices without their consent is legal in some regions of the world such as Texas (also referred to as &amp;quot;one-party consent states&amp;quot;), while being illegal in others such as California (also referred to as &amp;quot;two-party consent states&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;legalclarity.org/is-it-illegal-to-record-a-conversation-in-california/&amp;lt;!--unable to insert link due to spam filter--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This wikidebate explores the reasons for and against the legality of recording peoples&#039; voices without their consent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recording peoples&#039; voices without their consent should be legal==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arguments for ===&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Argument for}}: Voice recordings can provide valuable evidence of bullying, threats, and other bad behaviour, because voice recordings are a stronger confirmation that someone said something than a testimony.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{Objection}}: In the age of artificial intelligence, there is a likelihood that a voice recording was faked using AI.&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Argument for}}: Voice recordings make it possible to replay parts of a conversation that were not clearly understood by the listener in the moment, to clear up misunderstandings.&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Argument for}}: Voice recordings can preserve life memories with beloved friends and family. This is especially true for memories with people who are terminally ill. Since they probably won&#039;t live for long, their consent shouldn&#039;t be necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arguments against ===&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Argument against}}: People might discuss sensitive topics such as their health and intimate life which they do not wish others to hear besides the person they are speaking to. A voice recording would let someone play it back to other people.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{Objection}}: If someone does not trust someone else with keeping something secret, one should not disclose it in the first place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jody</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Should_recording_the_voices_of_unconsenting_people_be_legal%3F&amp;diff=10571</id>
		<title>Should recording the voices of unconsenting people be legal?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Should_recording_the_voices_of_unconsenting_people_be_legal%3F&amp;diff=10571"/>
		<updated>2026-04-29T22:03:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jody: I was going to publish this to Wikiversity, but now that Atcovi sadly killed WikiDebates in his moral panic, I chose to submit it here instead. I am glad I found this place! I hereby release this contribution into the public domain under CC0 1.0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Recording peoples&#039; voices is legal in some regions of the world such as Texas (also referred to as &amp;quot;one-party consent states&amp;quot;), while being illegal in others such as California (also referred to as &amp;quot;two-party consent states&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;legalclarity.org/is-it-illegal-to-record-a-conversation-in-california/&amp;lt;!--unable to insert link due to spam filter--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This wikidebate explores the reasons for and against the legality of recording peoples&#039; voices without their consent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recording peoples&#039; voices without their consent should be legal==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arguments for ===&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Argument for}}: Voice recordings can provide valuable evidence of bullying, threats, and other bad behaviour, because voice recordings are a stronger confirmation that someone said something than a testimony.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{Objection}}: In the age of artificial intelligence, there is a likelihood that a voice recording was faked using AI.&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Argument for}}: Voice recordings make it possible to replay parts of a conversation that were not clearly understood by the listener in the moment, to clear up misunderstandings.&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Argument for}}: Voice recordings can preserve life memories with beloved friends and family. This is especially true for memories with people who are terminally ill. Since they probably won&#039;t live for long, their consent shouldn&#039;t be necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arguments against ===&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Argument against}}: People might discuss sensitive topics such as their health and intimate life which they do not wish others to hear besides the person they are speaking to. A voice recording would let someone play it back to other people.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{Objection}}: If someone does not trust someone else with keeping something secret, one should not disclose it in the first place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jody</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>