https://en.wikidebates.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Brent+Silby 2026-06-04T03:44:45Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.43.6 https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Arguments_for_the_existence_of_God_are_all_argumentative_biases&diff=9444 2025-02-26T21:13:16Z

<p>Brent Silby: Added an argument</p> <hr /> <div>{{Argument<br /> |justifications={{Justification<br /> |page=Reversing the burden of proof<br /> |displayed-title=Reversing the burden of proof<br /> }}{{Justification<br /> |page=Panglossian reasoning<br /> |displayed-title=Panglossian reasoning<br /> }}{{Justification<br /> |page=Argument from ignorance<br /> |displayed-title=Argument from ignorance<br /> }}{{Justification<br /> |page=Circular reasoning<br /> |displayed-title=Circular reasoning<br /> }}{{Justification<br /> |page=A call to nature<br /> |displayed-title=A call to nature<br /> }}{{Justification<br /> |page=Belief in the justice of the world<br /> |displayed-title=Belief in the justice of the world<br /> }}{{Justification<br /> |page=Intentionality bias<br /> |displayed-title=Intentionality bias<br /> }}{{Justification<br /> |page=Argumentative mille-feuille<br /> |displayed-title=Argumentative mille-feuille<br /> }}{{Justification<br /> |page=False dilemma<br /> |displayed-title=False dilemma<br /> }}<br /> |objections={{Objection<br /> |page=Non sequitur<br /> |displayed-title=Non sequitur<br /> }}<br /> |sections=Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality<br /> |keywords=God<br /> }}</div>

Brent Silby https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Non_sequitur&diff=9443 2025-02-26T21:09:47Z

<p>Brent Silby: Undo revision 9438 by Brent Silby (talk)</p> <hr /> <div>{{Argument<br /> |displayed-title=Non sequitur<br /> |initialisation=Objection@554<br /> |summary=The argument claims that &quot;arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases.&quot; However, the only justification offered for the claim is a general list of fallacies. No justification has been provided to think that all arguments for the existence of God commit one or more of the listed fallacies.<br /> |quotes={{Quote<br /> |quote=A non sequitur fallacy is a statement or conclusion that does not follow logically from what preceded it. Non sequiturs can be responses that have nothing to do with the conversation or flawed conclusions “based” on what preceded them.<br /> |authors=Kassiani Nikolopoulou<br /> |article=Non Sequitur Fallacy<br /> |date=05/04/2023<br /> |link=https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/non-sequitur-fallacy/<br /> }}<br /> |sections=Philosophy, Religion and spirituality<br /> }}</div>

Brent Silby https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Generalization&diff=9442 2025-02-26T21:08:19Z

<p>Brent Silby: Removed the article since it returns an error &quot;Modifying :| failed. No target page specified&quot;</p> <hr /> <div></div>

Brent Silby https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Hasty_generalization&diff=9441 2025-02-26T21:07:35Z

<p>Brent Silby: Brent Silby moved page Hasty generalization to Generalization</p> <hr /> <div>#REDIRECT [[Generalization]]</div>

Brent Silby https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Generalization&diff=9440 2025-02-26T21:07:35Z

<p>Brent Silby: Brent Silby moved page Hasty generalization to Generalization</p> <hr /> <div>{{Argument<br /> |displayed-title=Hasty generalization<br /> |initialisation=Objection@554<br /> |summary=The argument claims that &quot;arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases.&quot; However, the only justification offered for the claim is a general list of fallacies. No justification has been provided to think that all arguments for the existence of God commit one or more of the listed fallacies.<br /> |sections=Philosophy, Religion and spirituality<br /> }}</div>

Brent Silby https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Generalization&diff=9439 2025-02-26T21:06:53Z

<p>Brent Silby: Created page with &quot;{{Argument |displayed-title=Hasty generalization |initialisation=Objection@554 |summary=The argument claims that &quot;arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative bias...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>{{Argument<br /> |displayed-title=Hasty generalization<br /> |initialisation=Objection@554<br /> |summary=The argument claims that &quot;arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases.&quot; However, the only justification offered for the claim is a general list of fallacies. No justification has been provided to think that all arguments for the existence of God commit one or more of the listed fallacies.<br /> |sections=Philosophy, Religion and spirituality<br /> }}</div>

Brent Silby https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Non_sequitur&diff=9438 2025-02-26T20:59:54Z

<p>Brent Silby: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Argument<br /> |displayed-title=Non sequitur<br /> |initialisation=Objection@554<br /> |summary=The argument claims that &quot;arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases.&quot; However, the only justification offered for the claim is a general list of fallacies. No justification has been provided to think that all arguments for the existence of God commit one or more of the listed fallacies.<br /> |sections=Philosophy, Religion and spirituality<br /> }}</div>

Brent Silby https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Non_sequitur&diff=9437 2025-02-26T20:54:43Z

<p>Brent Silby: Added a quote about a non sequitur.</p> <hr /> <div>{{Argument<br /> |displayed-title=Non sequitur<br /> |initialisation=Objection@554<br /> |summary=The argument claims that &quot;arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases.&quot; However, the only justification offered for the claim is a general list of fallacies. No justification has been provided to think that all arguments for the existence of God commit one or more of the listed fallacies.<br /> |quotes={{Quote<br /> |quote=A non sequitur fallacy is a statement or conclusion that does not follow logically from what preceded it. Non sequiturs can be responses that have nothing to do with the conversation or flawed conclusions “based” on what preceded them.<br /> |authors=Kassiani Nikolopoulou<br /> |article=Non Sequitur Fallacy<br /> |date=05/04/2023<br /> |link=https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/non-sequitur-fallacy/<br /> }}<br /> |sections=Philosophy, Religion and spirituality<br /> }}</div>

Brent Silby https://en.wikidebates.org/w/index.php?title=Non_sequitur&diff=9436 2025-02-26T20:50:06Z

<p>Brent Silby: Created page with &quot;{{Argument |displayed-title=Non sequitur |initialisation=Objection@554 |summary=The argument claims that &quot;arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases.&quot; How...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>{{Argument<br /> |displayed-title=Non sequitur<br /> |initialisation=Objection@554<br /> |summary=The argument claims that &quot;arguments for the existence of God are all argumentative biases.&quot; However, the only justification offered for the claim is a general list of fallacies. No justification has been provided to think that all arguments for the existence of God commit one or more of the listed fallacies.<br /> |sections=Philosophy, Religion and spirituality<br /> }}</div>

Brent Silby